How to report untagged vehicles in harford county maryland

Bichy at or bbichy linowes-law. Renee Finley at or rfinley linowes-law. Judyann Lee at or jlee linowes-law. Linowes and Blocher LLP has prepared this e-blast for general information purposes only, and the information contained in it does not constitute legal advice. I've not seen a road article that had a more contentious tenure on the front page then our recent experience with Interstate 15 in Arizona. I suspect this is just a symptom the amount of article rot from the time of FAC review and the time featured on the page this is one of our older FA's. If you compare today's version from 3 days ago, the article is substantially different.

However, I think some good things have come out of this, that merit some wider discussion:. Thoughts please? Dave talk , 14 September UTC. Would anyone be against automatically sending after a time period we determine older Featured Articles to ACR? It could be a safeguard against article rot. Version 0. Articles were selected based on their assessed importance and quality , then article versions revisionIDs were chosen for trustworthiness freedom from vandalism using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm. We would like to ask you to review the U. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.

You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0. We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0. As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide. Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback! For the Wikipedia 1.

It's the 20th of the month, and we only have 10 days left. We could use some DYK hooks for the portal for October. Our portal doesn't require recent article creation, or specific amounts of expansion.

The Star-Democrat from Easton, Maryland on May 10, · Page 32

All that's really needed is a catchy hook that's cited in the article. Any takers?


  • Navigation menu.
  • brandon florida arrest jan 23 2009!
  • New Maryland Law Affects Towing of Vehicles From Private Parking Lots?
  • texas birth certificates via money order.
  • You are here;

Place your nominations here. See here for details. The article has moved from the first stage to the second. It is now up for removal as a Featured Article, instead of just being reviewed. The areas of concern are: "referencing, comprehensiveness, updatedness, lead, formatting". If anyone is in a position to help clear up those concerns, the article could be kept, but if not, it could be delisted in about 2 weeks. Dough 48 72 , 5 October UTC. I've reverted 4 articles in Michigan, and moved the exit numbers into the notes column as appropriate, but be on the lookout.

My Internet access will be probably limited for the next week or so. I wouldn't exactly call this person's actions vandalism yet, but I have left a note on the IP's talk page. I realize that the focus of the Project is to improve articles on specific U. I've noted in my research that many people important to the development of auto trails, U.

For example, Anton L. Westgard, pathfinder for the National Highways Association and AAA , was perhaps the most important individual in the layout of auto trails and later U. He lead the National Park to Park Highway motorcade after pathfinding it, named the Midland Trail , criss-crossed the country numerous times, etc. He has no article at all. His brother W. Westgard was also an important pathfinder for AAA.

Other important people such as John Hollis Bankhead , author of the first federal highway act, and for whom the Bankhead Highway was named, have very short articles indeed. See Talk:Kansas Turnpike Merge proposal. Dough 48 72 , 8 October UTC. I have created a new bot that can create and upload a full sequence of highway markers. I have already used it to complete Alberta's highways markers and I am looking for new projects.

If you provide me a completed SVG template and which signs you are requesting, I will run the bot. At this point this bot only runs on Commons, and will only create "free" images. Dough 48 72 , 19 October UTC. Arkansas technically has extremely few concurrencies. It has thousands of "sections". Basically whenever two highways meet, the more important one stays continuous, and the lesser route breaks into two sections, one on either side of the route. They never concur unless it is an official exception. This means that basically all of Arkansas' highway pages are inaccurate.

Also, this is the case with every route in Arkansas including U. What can be done about this? This discussion was moved after five days of inactivity at Talk:List of Arkansas state highways. I noticed the new junction list in Maryland Route includes mileposts for the termini of one-way pairs, it is the first such occurrence I have ever seen.

Is it against USRD standard for one-way pair termini to be included, or should they be included in all junction lists where applicable? Dough 48 72 , 17 October UTC. Please take a few moments to provide your comments about this proposal. If you are interested in joining Wikipedia:WikiProject United States please add your name under the applicable section here. Does this project cover roads, streets and highways or is there a limit in the scope of the project? I have proposed a move at Talk:Florida State Road and would like some feedback.

Thank you. I feel as if one of the most difficult sources of information to find when writing road articles is junction milage. They're usually buried somewhere within the state DOT's website and take a lot of searching to find. Some state DOTs don't even provide this information and it can be even more frustrating to search for this information, only to find out it doesn't exist. Any input on this idea? Hello, WikiProject U.

ADDITIONAL PRESS

We are looking for editors to join WikiProject United States , an outreach effort which aims to support development of United States related articles in Wikipedia. We thought you might be interested, and hope that you will join us. Sorry for my ignorance but I wanted to clarify a scope question about this project. I have found quite a few articles related to Laws, accidents, legal cases, people, etc that would seem to possibly fall into the scope of this project but it seems as though the project only covers the actualy road. Which is fine I just wanted to undeerstand. The project's logo has been uploaded to Commons.

Please note, that the logo is still hosted locally on Wikipedia and this discussion will not affect that. We would like to ask you to review the Interstate Highway System articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. If you have already provided feedback, we deeply appreciate it. Highway system articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. But I am working on the infobox for Florida State Road A1A , and that road has 9 discontinuous sections it's broken into 3 at the moment, but there are actually 9.

Should we look into adding more parameters to the infobox, or should we handle the infobox differently in this situation? Roads with the logo? I don't know if we want to extend the "rebranding" to the portal or not, but if we do, that's the template to change. Since there are no concurrencies in Arkansas, how should mileages be displayed? Should the "implicit" mileage be included even though it is technically not really part of the route?

It was mentioned here earlier to use the intuitive concurrencies in the route descriptions even if they are not signed in reality, but do we also do this for the mileages? Moved after inactivity from Talk:List of Arkansas state highways. Dough 48 72 , 18 November UTC. When you have a chance, please add examples for your own areas, or suggest here in talk what kind of examples we should be providing to cover as many scenarios as possible. I can merge that over into the parent s-d article now that that article exists at a decent level.

Thoughts, concerns, questions? If you have any comments, questions or suggestions please take a moment and let me know. Could someone with AWB run it over U. Route 30 in Iowa for overlinking? This is the last issue brought up with the peer review that is holding me back from going to FAC. Thanks in advance. Dough 48 72 , 30 November UTC.

I started a discussion about Texas having lists of highways in counties versus having templates of highways in counties. I first posted about the by-county categories for state highways in Florida in August , but nothing ever really came out of that discussion. In the time since then, I've found by-county categories for state highways in Arkansas as well. With the recent proliferation of "Transportation in Foo County, Bar" categories, the by-county state highway categories have become obsolete thanks to their uber-narrow scope.

Since the abbreviated consensus of the last discussion was that these cats should be canned, I suppose I'm asking for assistance in setting up the CFD s. At the moment, I don't have the time to set up a large umbrella nom nor tag 70 or so categories with a CFD notice. I'm willing to help in some form, but as of right now I can't bear the whole load. Bumping so this doesn't get archived by the bot. Bumped again. Guess I'm going to have to take a couple of days this week and get the ball rolling on this myself. I just hand coded Category:Transportation in New Mexico by county and associated sub cats, and populated them all Dough 48 72 , 6 December UTC.

I have submitted a proposal at the Village pump regarding tagging non article items in Wikipedia. Please take a moment and let me know what you think. Route Dough 48 72 , 11 December UTC. Your Majesties, thank you for all your hard work. This award is for the project itself. Well done! What a grand effort. When more people qualify to join please let me know. Interstate - has no reliable hits on Google and zero hits in terms of news sources.

Please contribute to the discussions. See Talk:U. Dough 48 72 , 22 December UTC. Merger discussion: Talk:U. If so, how do you code it? Route 29 in Virginia Merge proposal. Dough 48 72 , 29 December UTC. See discussion here. Route 74 North Carolina , see Talk:U. See Talk:Interstate 8 Merge proposal. Dough 48 72 , 30 December UTC. While nominally, our stub reduction drive didn't come anywhere close to our goal of eliminating stubs, I think most of us feel it was a success.

Am I alone on this? While there is still some time left in December, I thought we should start hammering out our goals for I'm going to ask a few questions to try to get a good idea where the project stands. Just write a short comment after each question. By no means is this a binding poll. This will all end up in the next edition of the newsletter? If there are any other questions I should be asking, please add them!

Let's make this formal. There were two options that stuck out for a stub-removing goal — finish the original and a new goal of Which would you prefer? Just sign below. See Talk:Virginia State Route See Talk:Kilometre Zero Merger. Dough 48 72 , 13 January UTC. See Talk:Interstate for discussion. Dough 48 72 , 14 January UTC. The current working practice of USRD is to demote inactive state highway WikiProjects to taskforces, where they remain indefinitely until activity resumes in that state, if at all.

It has been proposed on off-wiki channels to delete some of the task forces that have remained inactive for years and redirect them to USRD. I thought I would bring the matter here for discussion. Personally, I would prefer keeping the task force pages that we have now to list USRD standards and article assessments specific to a certain state.

In addition, I wouldn't be opposed to creating task force pages for states without a subproject or task force currently. Dough 48 72 , 27 December UTC. I'd like to pose two questions for the group: 1 Is there any harm in leaving the dormant task forces the way they are? It seems the status quo has been fine, so I'm just wondering what is the impetus for this proposed change. For the record I think redirecting would be better than deleting, so the page histories remain intact. I was one of the editors if not the only one that originally tossed out this idea on IRC months ago.

My logic was that these inactive task forces are often littered with outdated items, whether it be obsolete article standards or busted resource links. Additionally, since they're inactive, the talk pages aren't being used. About the only use I can think of is a set of custom standards to accommodate for some local quirk, but I doubt any of the states in question are developed enough to need a custom structure. As has been said above, I think redirection is the way to go in the event someone wants to revive the projects.

I would suggest redirecting both the project and talk pages to WP: and WT:USRD, respectively, so that someone looking for help with that state arrives at a place where they can get that help. It seems that most people are okay with doing this. Next proposal: I propose that we implement this in a way similar to how the demotion of projects are currently handled - with the template, and the 7 day discussion, and all.

Seems like there's consensus; trying to avoid this section from being archived until I get time to implement. This may be an ill-conceived afterthought, but what if we folded all the task forces into regions? I'd propose using the four main census regions as a guide. The benefit would be to not bury the inactive states and give states that don't have any page somewhere to go. The current resource pages can be split among the four regions and turned into disambig pages.

I do not advocate forcing the current subprojects into the regional task forces, but they would have a place to go if they ever became inactive. We could possibly merge in subproject resources, but that can discussed later. I was thinking it would be a good idea to annotate why our standards are what they are.

I think it would be useful for other roads projects to see how we got to where we are. This could be extended to any of our pages, but I was really thinking of the standards first. It's wrong. Circle shields in Virginia are for secondary routes; all routes in the series are primary routes, and so should have the Virginia highway shield. Back in December I nominated these for deletion on Commons due to their poor quality, inaccuracy, and redundancy to the newer SVG images.

The deletion requests were closed as keep with a statement that didn't reflect the reasoning to delete, and the administrator who did so refuses to acknowledge the actual problems with the images and the actual deletion rationale. I'm not sure if its considered bad form if I renominate these myself, but maybe if a few editors commented on new deletion requests it might get the message across?

Basically, two options are being presented: fold all designation-related dab pages into the list of numbered highways series of set index articles, or list all disambiguated designations on the set index articles and have dab pages for each ambiguous designation.

Discussion is ongoing at the link above. When is it appropriate to mention in a highway article that a story was set or filmed along a highway? This is a general question spurred from a specific one currently taking place in an article. There's a lot of grey area, that may make it impossible to have a universal rule. Here's some numbered cases:. I'd like at least some generic discussion on where is that line done.

I know we can all list examples, but please only list more examples if they are as grey as the ones mentioned above. Dave talk , 22 January UTC. Roads, as capital expenses, should be using a different inflationary adjustment technique. For the time being, I've commented out all of the inflationary adjustments in M-6 Michigan highway and I'm going to suggest that others using the template in their articles do the same on articles coming up for review.

I'm going to post on the template's talk page, maybe they can update it with a parameter to give us better results in the future. First, Per a comment on the talk page, I have added the US roads portal to the list of US related portals on the bottom of the portal main page. As one of the most active US related WikiProjects I also wanted to ask if anyone would be interested in adding a selected article related to the US roads to the list of featured articles. If not perhaps you could suggest one and I will add it? The article should preferably be GA or higher quality or it may be B class if it is high or top importance.

I would like the project to nominated 4 articles we can add to this portal. My thoughts are:. I welcome any substitutions that might be suggested, and I hope we can make the additions to the portal in a timely fashion. I have added a recommendation to the talk page of Portal:United States for Consideration. Since we have more than US related projects, about 75 of which are active in some capacity, I would like to add a section to the portal to feature a project I am trying to determine the interval but I was thinking random pick like the articles are.

I believe this would draw interest to the projects, to the articles they support and even to the portal itself at least from the members of that projet I hope. Does anyone have any comments, concerns or suggestions with regards to doing this? As one of the more active projects I was considering profiling US roads as one of the first along with NRHP and United States not sure about the order yet starting February 1st adding more after that. Dough 48 72 , 31 January UTC. What happened to listing "major intersections" in the infobox? I thought this was an appropriate place to ask this since Template talk:Cite news isn't really responsive.

Denver Post. September 13, What happened to the accessdate? Did I write something wrong? Dough 48 72 , 2 February UTC. Route 1 in Massachusetts Merge proposal. A couple additions I made were a color code for how long a request has sat. Under 60 days, it's green. Between 60 and days, it's yellow. From days to 1 year, it's red. After a year, it's black.

Fresh Video

The colors were arbitrary as were the lengths of time. User:Dream out loud has nominated Pulaski Skyway for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here.

This IP, It's more annoying than troublesome, but it's made Category:Jct template transclusions with missing shields light up like a Christmas tree. Just another thing to keep an eye on. I've not seen a road article that had a more contentious tenure on the front page then our recent experience with Interstate 15 in Arizona. I suspect this is just a symptom the amount of article rot from the time of FAC review and the time featured on the page this is one of our older FA's.

If you compare today's version from 3 days ago, the article is substantially different. However, I think some good things have come out of this, that merit some wider discussion:.

IMMIGRATION LAW

Thoughts please? Dave talk , 14 September UTC. Would anyone be against automatically sending after a time period we determine older Featured Articles to ACR? It could be a safeguard against article rot. Version 0. Articles were selected based on their assessed importance and quality , then article versions revisionIDs were chosen for trustworthiness freedom from vandalism using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.

We would like to ask you to review the U. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0. You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0. We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0. As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide.

Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback! For the Wikipedia 1. It's the 20th of the month, and we only have 10 days left. We could use some DYK hooks for the portal for October. Our portal doesn't require recent article creation, or specific amounts of expansion. All that's really needed is a catchy hook that's cited in the article. Any takers? Place your nominations here. See here for details. The article has moved from the first stage to the second. It is now up for removal as a Featured Article, instead of just being reviewed. The areas of concern are: "referencing, comprehensiveness, updatedness, lead, formatting".

If anyone is in a position to help clear up those concerns, the article could be kept, but if not, it could be delisted in about 2 weeks. Dough 48 72 , 5 October UTC. I've reverted 4 articles in Michigan, and moved the exit numbers into the notes column as appropriate, but be on the lookout. My Internet access will be probably limited for the next week or so. I wouldn't exactly call this person's actions vandalism yet, but I have left a note on the IP's talk page. I realize that the focus of the Project is to improve articles on specific U. I've noted in my research that many people important to the development of auto trails, U.

For example, Anton L. Westgard, pathfinder for the National Highways Association and AAA , was perhaps the most important individual in the layout of auto trails and later U. He lead the National Park to Park Highway motorcade after pathfinding it, named the Midland Trail , criss-crossed the country numerous times, etc. He has no article at all. His brother W. Westgard was also an important pathfinder for AAA. Other important people such as John Hollis Bankhead , author of the first federal highway act, and for whom the Bankhead Highway was named, have very short articles indeed.

See Talk:Kansas Turnpike Merge proposal. Dough 48 72 , 8 October UTC. I have created a new bot that can create and upload a full sequence of highway markers. I have already used it to complete Alberta's highways markers and I am looking for new projects. If you provide me a completed SVG template and which signs you are requesting, I will run the bot. At this point this bot only runs on Commons, and will only create "free" images. Dough 48 72 , 19 October UTC. Arkansas technically has extremely few concurrencies. It has thousands of "sections". Basically whenever two highways meet, the more important one stays continuous, and the lesser route breaks into two sections, one on either side of the route.

They never concur unless it is an official exception. This means that basically all of Arkansas' highway pages are inaccurate. Also, this is the case with every route in Arkansas including U. What can be done about this? This discussion was moved after five days of inactivity at Talk:List of Arkansas state highways.


  • find network printer by ip address.
  • ADDITIONAL PRESS.
  • data fleet location management tracking two vehicle way.
  • find out if someone has a will?

I noticed the new junction list in Maryland Route includes mileposts for the termini of one-way pairs, it is the first such occurrence I have ever seen. Is it against USRD standard for one-way pair termini to be included, or should they be included in all junction lists where applicable?

Dough 48 72 , 17 October UTC. Please take a few moments to provide your comments about this proposal. If you are interested in joining Wikipedia:WikiProject United States please add your name under the applicable section here. Does this project cover roads, streets and highways or is there a limit in the scope of the project? I have proposed a move at Talk:Florida State Road and would like some feedback.

Thank you. I feel as if one of the most difficult sources of information to find when writing road articles is junction milage. They're usually buried somewhere within the state DOT's website and take a lot of searching to find. Some state DOTs don't even provide this information and it can be even more frustrating to search for this information, only to find out it doesn't exist.

Any input on this idea? Hello, WikiProject U. We are looking for editors to join WikiProject United States , an outreach effort which aims to support development of United States related articles in Wikipedia. We thought you might be interested, and hope that you will join us. Sorry for my ignorance but I wanted to clarify a scope question about this project. I have found quite a few articles related to Laws, accidents, legal cases, people, etc that would seem to possibly fall into the scope of this project but it seems as though the project only covers the actualy road.

Which is fine I just wanted to undeerstand. The project's logo has been uploaded to Commons.

Maryland Law on Vehicle Abandonment on Private Property

Please note, that the logo is still hosted locally on Wikipedia and this discussion will not affect that. We would like to ask you to review the Interstate Highway System articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. If you have already provided feedback, we deeply appreciate it. Highway system articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. But I am working on the infobox for Florida State Road A1A , and that road has 9 discontinuous sections it's broken into 3 at the moment, but there are actually 9.

Should we look into adding more parameters to the infobox, or should we handle the infobox differently in this situation? Roads with the logo? I don't know if we want to extend the "rebranding" to the portal or not, but if we do, that's the template to change. Since there are no concurrencies in Arkansas, how should mileages be displayed? Should the "implicit" mileage be included even though it is technically not really part of the route? It was mentioned here earlier to use the intuitive concurrencies in the route descriptions even if they are not signed in reality, but do we also do this for the mileages?

Moved after inactivity from Talk:List of Arkansas state highways. Dough 48 72 , 18 November UTC. When you have a chance, please add examples for your own areas, or suggest here in talk what kind of examples we should be providing to cover as many scenarios as possible. I can merge that over into the parent s-d article now that that article exists at a decent level. Thoughts, concerns, questions? If you have any comments, questions or suggestions please take a moment and let me know.

Could someone with AWB run it over U. Route 30 in Iowa for overlinking? This is the last issue brought up with the peer review that is holding me back from going to FAC. Thanks in advance. Dough 48 72 , 30 November UTC. I started a discussion about Texas having lists of highways in counties versus having templates of highways in counties.

I first posted about the by-county categories for state highways in Florida in August , but nothing ever really came out of that discussion. In the time since then, I've found by-county categories for state highways in Arkansas as well. With the recent proliferation of "Transportation in Foo County, Bar" categories, the by-county state highway categories have become obsolete thanks to their uber-narrow scope.

Since the abbreviated consensus of the last discussion was that these cats should be canned, I suppose I'm asking for assistance in setting up the CFD s. At the moment, I don't have the time to set up a large umbrella nom nor tag 70 or so categories with a CFD notice. I'm willing to help in some form, but as of right now I can't bear the whole load. Bumping so this doesn't get archived by the bot. Bumped again. Guess I'm going to have to take a couple of days this week and get the ball rolling on this myself.

I just hand coded Category:Transportation in New Mexico by county and associated sub cats, and populated them all Dough 48 72 , 6 December UTC. I have submitted a proposal at the Village pump regarding tagging non article items in Wikipedia. Please take a moment and let me know what you think. Route Dough 48 72 , 11 December UTC. Your Majesties, thank you for all your hard work.

This award is for the project itself. Well done! What a grand effort. When more people qualify to join please let me know. Interstate - has no reliable hits on Google and zero hits in terms of news sources. Please contribute to the discussions. See Talk:U. Dough 48 72 , 22 December UTC. Merger discussion: Talk:U.

If so, how do you code it? Route 29 in Virginia Merge proposal. Dough 48 72 , 29 December UTC. See discussion here. Route 74 North Carolina , see Talk:U. See Talk:Interstate 8 Merge proposal. Dough 48 72 , 30 December UTC. While nominally, our stub reduction drive didn't come anywhere close to our goal of eliminating stubs, I think most of us feel it was a success. Am I alone on this? While there is still some time left in December, I thought we should start hammering out our goals for I'm going to ask a few questions to try to get a good idea where the project stands.

Just write a short comment after each question. By no means is this a binding poll. This will all end up in the next edition of the newsletter? If there are any other questions I should be asking, please add them! Let's make this formal. There were two options that stuck out for a stub-removing goal — finish the original and a new goal of Which would you prefer?

Just sign below. See Talk:Virginia State Route See Talk:Kilometre Zero Merger. Dough 48 72 , 13 January UTC. See Talk:Interstate for discussion. Dough 48 72 , 14 January UTC. The current working practice of USRD is to demote inactive state highway WikiProjects to taskforces, where they remain indefinitely until activity resumes in that state, if at all. It has been proposed on off-wiki channels to delete some of the task forces that have remained inactive for years and redirect them to USRD.

I thought I would bring the matter here for discussion. Personally, I would prefer keeping the task force pages that we have now to list USRD standards and article assessments specific to a certain state. In addition, I wouldn't be opposed to creating task force pages for states without a subproject or task force currently. Dough 48 72 , 27 December UTC. I'd like to pose two questions for the group: 1 Is there any harm in leaving the dormant task forces the way they are? It seems the status quo has been fine, so I'm just wondering what is the impetus for this proposed change. For the record I think redirecting would be better than deleting, so the page histories remain intact.

I was one of the editors if not the only one that originally tossed out this idea on IRC months ago. My logic was that these inactive task forces are often littered with outdated items, whether it be obsolete article standards or busted resource links.

Come Find Your Future in Harford County, Maryland

Additionally, since they're inactive, the talk pages aren't being used. About the only use I can think of is a set of custom standards to accommodate for some local quirk, but I doubt any of the states in question are developed enough to need a custom structure. As has been said above, I think redirection is the way to go in the event someone wants to revive the projects.

I would suggest redirecting both the project and talk pages to WP: and WT:USRD, respectively, so that someone looking for help with that state arrives at a place where they can get that help. It seems that most people are okay with doing this. Next proposal: I propose that we implement this in a way similar to how the demotion of projects are currently handled - with the template, and the 7 day discussion, and all. Seems like there's consensus; trying to avoid this section from being archived until I get time to implement. This may be an ill-conceived afterthought, but what if we folded all the task forces into regions?

I'd propose using the four main census regions as a guide. The benefit would be to not bury the inactive states and give states that don't have any page somewhere to go. The current resource pages can be split among the four regions and turned into disambig pages. I do not advocate forcing the current subprojects into the regional task forces, but they would have a place to go if they ever became inactive. We could possibly merge in subproject resources, but that can discussed later.

I was thinking it would be a good idea to annotate why our standards are what they are. I think it would be useful for other roads projects to see how we got to where we are. This could be extended to any of our pages, but I was really thinking of the standards first. It's wrong. Circle shields in Virginia are for secondary routes; all routes in the series are primary routes, and so should have the Virginia highway shield. Back in December I nominated these for deletion on Commons due to their poor quality, inaccuracy, and redundancy to the newer SVG images.

The deletion requests were closed as keep with a statement that didn't reflect the reasoning to delete, and the administrator who did so refuses to acknowledge the actual problems with the images and the actual deletion rationale. I'm not sure if its considered bad form if I renominate these myself, but maybe if a few editors commented on new deletion requests it might get the message across? Basically, two options are being presented: fold all designation-related dab pages into the list of numbered highways series of set index articles, or list all disambiguated designations on the set index articles and have dab pages for each ambiguous designation.

Discussion is ongoing at the link above. When is it appropriate to mention in a highway article that a story was set or filmed along a highway? This is a general question spurred from a specific one currently taking place in an article. There's a lot of grey area, that may make it impossible to have a universal rule. Here's some numbered cases:. I'd like at least some generic discussion on where is that line done.

I know we can all list examples, but please only list more examples if they are as grey as the ones mentioned above.

Harford County Sheriff's Office

Dave talk , 22 January UTC. Roads, as capital expenses, should be using a different inflationary adjustment technique. For the time being, I've commented out all of the inflationary adjustments in M-6 Michigan highway and I'm going to suggest that others using the template in their articles do the same on articles coming up for review.

I'm going to post on the template's talk page, maybe they can update it with a parameter to give us better results in the future. First, Per a comment on the talk page, I have added the US roads portal to the list of US related portals on the bottom of the portal main page. As one of the most active US related WikiProjects I also wanted to ask if anyone would be interested in adding a selected article related to the US roads to the list of featured articles. If not perhaps you could suggest one and I will add it? The article should preferably be GA or higher quality or it may be B class if it is high or top importance.

I would like the project to nominated 4 articles we can add to this portal. My thoughts are:. I welcome any substitutions that might be suggested, and I hope we can make the additions to the portal in a timely fashion. I have added a recommendation to the talk page of Portal:United States for Consideration. Since we have more than US related projects, about 75 of which are active in some capacity, I would like to add a section to the portal to feature a project I am trying to determine the interval but I was thinking random pick like the articles are.

I believe this would draw interest to the projects, to the articles they support and even to the portal itself at least from the members of that projet I hope. Does anyone have any comments, concerns or suggestions with regards to doing this? As one of the more active projects I was considering profiling US roads as one of the first along with NRHP and United States not sure about the order yet starting February 1st adding more after that.

Dough 48 72 , 31 January UTC. What happened to listing "major intersections" in the infobox? I thought this was an appropriate place to ask this since Template talk:Cite news isn't really responsive. Denver Post. September 13, What happened to the accessdate? Did I write something wrong?

admin